Psychology of a Hoax
Critical Voices
Reproduced with permission of author, Horst Wilden.
(Original text available here).

 

 

Psychology of a Hoax
The IsaacCaret Phenomenon

Chapters
Chapter #
Chapter Title
I

Counting Witnesses
II
 The Isaac Document
III
 All Those Other Witnesses...
IV
 Errors And Confusion
V
 Experts, Freeloaders, Artists and Whistleblowers
VI
 The Madness Grows
VII
 The Heirs Of Isaac
VIII
 The Eco-effect
Additional
 Critical Voices
Email
 Contact The Author
Original Text
 Visit The Original Webpage/s at FortuneCity

 
The 2007 Dragonfly Drone UFO Hoax

Critical Voices

Critical voices to Parts I - IV

Mostly a copy-paste job (IMO), done by none other than the ex-OM Reader, found on the ATS [hoax] topic, and which main purpose is to criticize the DRT.

Nemo, member of the DRT, on OMF, 23rd of May 2008

 

Hmm. having a professional background in the subject (clinical psychology) - i have to say that the article in question - though very well researched (OK, who was it?!) - is not about 'psychological' profiles of 'drone victims'. At all. :o;D

It is also a mistake to 'label' people with such terms. (one could argue that there is perhaps a more valid case to study in the 'pseudo-skeptic' / 'fanatical debunker' type of 'behavior' - ie cognitive dissonance and the inability to respect the 'beliefs' of others. )

Anyway, any 'diagnosis' of groups or individuals wrt the 'drones' is biased in this (article) case, against the witness. None of them are 'victims' of anything. ::) All purely IMO.

Admin of OMF, 23rd of May 2008

 

I have never understood why this was written in the first place. This dissertation assumes the drones are a hoax. It assumes the smallest most insignificant details of who said what on what day are of major concern to the big picture. And it hasn't a clue what is really going on. Apologies to the reader. ;)

TomiUK, member of the DRT, on OMF, 23rd of May 2008

 
The Armchair Research Committee Home Page