Sunday, 23 March 2008

Capitola Dragonfly Drone UFOs Spotted On Prime Time!!

A couple of days ago, I made a Blog post on the Drone UFOs, “Dragonfly Drone Hunters – The Search For Rajinder/Rajman1977” which described how a group of members at the Open Minds Forum have paid to enlist the help of a couple of Private Investigators to try and locate the utility pole which is located in the, “Rajman1977” Drone images and subsequently locate the witness himself.

Well this story ran on the 18th March and the History Channels new UFO Flagship, “UFO-Hunters” heavily featured the Drone UFO images. I personally feel the UFO-Hunters presented the Drones with little in the way of middle ground, it appears that the UFO-Hunters team thought that they were either proof of reverse engineering of alien technology or a hoax.

The possibility that the Drones themselves could be manufactured or controlled by an extraterrestrial entity was strangely omitted, I say strangely as I feel the UFO Hunters (by definition if nothing else) should have at least of entertained this possibility. Bruce Maccabee was interviewed briefly and drew attention to the lack of any kind of aerodynamics present in the structure and design of the Drones yet still the investigation centred on the reverse engineering theory. If you are approaching the Drones from an evidence based perspective then after a quick browse the Isaac documents (which they possessed and discussed) it should be evident or at least very unlikely that the Drones were manufactured by human hands.

What follows is an excerpt from the Isaac documents under the, “Some Explanation for the Recent Sightings ” heading:

“I should first be clear that I'm not directly familiar with any of the crafts seen in the photos in their entirety. I've never seen them in a hangar or worked on them myself or seen aliens zipping around in them. However, I have worked with and seen many of the parts visible in these crafts…..These crafts have probably existed in their current form for decades, and I can say for sure that the technology behind them has existed for decades before that…..The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's. Much like the technology in these crafts themselves .”

I probably should point out at this juncture that I personally believe the entire Drone phenomenon to be a complete fabrication but I still believe that any Drone investigation should have at least been conducted in a way that allowed for the possibility that the Drones weren't a result of human engineering or under human control.

Anyway, here's the relevant section/s from the recent UFO-Hunters (7th) episode, including Bruce Maccabee and James Carrion (head of Mufon).

Back to the Private Investigators and it's turning out to be money well spent if purely for raising the profile of the Drone reports and informing the public of their existence and the search for witnesses. They even made it to Fox News recently, here's a short Fox News Report on the two Private Investigators charged with locating the utility pole and commissioned by OMF.

After no news for nearly a year we no have the LA-Times story on the 18th, UFO-Hunters appearance on the 19th and the Fox News segment on the 20th March!! Perhaps the end is nearing for a collection of some of the most intriguing UFO images and UFO reports of recent times.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

At 23 March 2008 15:05 , Blogger Alien Contactee said...

I've heard of people forced to write about certain things that they don't believe in but I don't understand why some take it upon themselves to report on something they believe to be a hoax unless they have motive to maybe to subliminally debunk the whole issue.

Reference to reverse engineering should have been presented by utilizing the Big Basin and Bohlman Road ridge drones and not the Chad drone. You already know why they chose Chad's and you know who was involved. Instead, neither the UFO Hunters or the Fox American Newsroom reported on those two but yet Isaac stated; "In fact, it was this technology that immediately jumped out at me when I saw the Chad and Rajman photos, and even 'moreso' in the Big Basin photos."

Consequently, the Big Basin drone was what Isaac experienced personally and his reports, photos and linguistics prove that.

Honestly, there is no way you can prove or disprove all 12 drones because there is simply not enough evidence to dismiss all of the them as either the truth or a fabrication. Not yet anyway. Some think there is certainly but that's only because they've failed to entrench themselves in the subject and only have bits and pieces.

I know you've entrenched yourself in the subject so I'm curious, why are you reporting on something that you do not believe in?

On the subject but off the subject, why is it that nobody debunks the camera phone photos taken by the Tahoe lady and Chad. If Chad is accused of CGI, where's the CGI in those camera phone photos?

Lastly, I believe wholeheartedly that MUFON's James Carrion only presented to the UFO Hunters what he wanted them to hear and not the whole nine yards.
.

 
At 24 March 2008 18:27 , Blogger M.N. said...

Hiya AC!!

I’ve missed your vitriolic rants aimed in my general direction and usually at the expense of my opinions and beliefs.

Let’s face it, in your opinion I’d be wrong irrespective of what angle I approached this from. In my post I addressed all the errors that I believe were made by the recent Drone segment on UFO Hunters and they are all errors that the, “Believers” should surely agree with?

"The possibility that the Drones themselves could be manufactured or controlled by an extraterrestrial entity was strangely omitted, I say strangely as I feel the UFO Hunters (by definition if nothing else) should have at least of entertained this possibility."

"The investigation centred on the reverse engineering theory. If you are approaching the Drones from an evidence based perspective then after a quick browse the Isaac documents (which they possessed and discussed) it should be evident or at least very unlikely that the Drones were manufactured by human hands."

"Any Drone investigation should have at least been conducted in a way that allowed for the possibility that the Drones weren't a result of human engineering or under human control."


If I’d merely left it at that I no doubt would have received a comment from you like, “Why didn’t you say you think they are a hoax?” It certainly seems like in your overtly critical opinion I can’t do right for doing wrong….

Regarding statements like, “I don't understand why some take it upon themselves to report on something they believe to be a hoax unless they have motive to maybe to subliminally debunk the whole issue.” & “I know you've entrenched yourself in the subject so I'm curious, why are you reporting on something that you do not believe in?”

What kind of inane logic is that? In case you’d missed the fact, my Blog is a, “UFO Blog.” If I never included anything I believed to be questionable it would only be updated VERY infrequently. This is why it’s not a, “What I believe to be true Blog.” And this is also why I usually present MY personal opinion along with the known facts, and believe me if it was my intentions to debunk anything then this would be clear and I certainly wouldn’t resort to employing a, “Subliminal” modus operandi in order to achieve it. This is blatantly evident by my comment, “I probably should point out at this juncture that I personally believe the entire Drone phenomenon to be a complete fabrication” which is neither subliminal nor debunking in nature, but merely offering my opinion.

And as you claim you, “Know” I’m entrenched in the subject then regardless of my personal belief why wouldn’t I comment on any new Drone developments?

And as for there being 12 Drones, I assume you’re also referencing LMH’s eyewitness accounts, ALL of which appeared after the fact and I don’t think you really want to travel down that route as practically every account directly contradicts what has already been divulged by Isaac and the witness accounts of those who originally submitted the Drone photographs.

When you say Isaac said: "In fact, it was this technology that immediately jumped out at me when I saw the Chad and Rajman photos, and even 'moreso' in the Big Basin photos." Then reach your conclusion that, “Consequently, the Big Basin drone was what Isaac experienced personally and his reports, photos and linguistics prove that."

Don’t you think this flawed interpretation is misleading? If you’re taking what Isaac says literally which it appears you are then he also said:

"I worked with these symbols more than anything during my time at PACL, and recognized them the moment I saw them in the photos. They appear in a very simple form on Chad’s craft, but appear in the more complex diagram form on the underside of the Big Basin craft as well. Both are unmistakable, even at the small size of the Big Basin photos."

In case you’ve forgot then go back and have a look at the underside of the Big Basin craft and you’ll see that the, “Language” undeniably appears on the panels that adorn the side of the craft.

Unmistakable” indeed……

 
At 17 December 2008 17:00 , Blogger Rich said...

These same pics were in the New Episode of The Sarah Connor Chronicles ?
Early frame grabs from some production studio maybe ?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home